bookshelves tomorrow. that does it for me. the rachel maddow show starts right now. >> i am proud of the new book and excited about a. i will say it's a really specific honor. i feel like could not have anticipated it before now to be a person banned from entering russia. >> same. >> getting the handoff from someone who was banned. >> we are both van. we are in the same studio and cannot do our shows in moscow. . thank you. and thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. really happy to have you here. ready?py the clerk. this is the people of the state of new york against donald j. pe trump, smz-71911/24. appearances starting with people. prosecutor joshua steinglass, for the people, assistant le district attorneys joshua stein

glass, michael colangelo, becky mangold, christopher conroy, and catherine ellis. good morning, emil bove, joined by president trump to my loft, joined by todd blanche, susan necheles. the judge, good morning. good morning, mr. trump. so the matter called into the ng record is the people's motion for contempt, meaning the prosecution's motion for e contempt.n' the judge says, quote, before ia hand down my decision, i wantedy to address the defense and mr. trump. mr. trump, as you know, the s prosecution has filed three separate motions asking this court to find you in contempt. in a moment, i'm going to hand down my decision on the third motion. which i -- in which i find you in criminal contempt for the tenth time. quote, it appears that the $1,000 fines are not serving as a deterrent. therefore, going forward, this

court will have to consider a jail sanction if recommended. h mr. trump, it is important to understand that the last thing i want to do is put you in jail. you are the former president of the united states and possibly the next president as well. there are many reasons why si incarceration is truly a last resort for me. to take that step would be disruptive to these proceedings which i imagine you want to endg as quickly as possible. a i also worry about the people who would have to execute that sanction. the court officers, the correction officers, the secret service detail among others. i worry about them. and about what would go into executing such a sanction. of course, i'm also aware of thi broader implications of such a sanction. the magnitude of such a decision is not one-sided. but at the end of the day, i have a job to do, and part of that job is to protect the t dignity of the judicial system and compel respect. your continued violations of this court's lawful order threaten to interfere with the n

administration of justice. constant attacks which constitute a direct attack on the rule of law. i cannot allow that to continue. so as much as i do not want to impose a jail sanction, and i have done everything i can to avoid doing so, i want you to understand that i will if necessary and appropriate. do the attorneys have any other questions about that? i will now hand down the ab decision from the court. this is for the defense. this is for the people. transcript then notes, whereupot the sergeant gives copies of the court's decision to the parties. the judge says, quote, you can i call the trial. clerk, this is people of the state of new york against donald j. trump, indictment 71543/23, case on trial continued. this was the third week of the e trial. this was a momentous thing that happened today. this is -- i mean, we kind of knew it was coming.

now that it's happened this is a momentous thing. this is an american criminal court. the judge saying you are repeatedly disobeying this lawful order. if lesser sanctions cannot persuade you to stop violating this court's order and 's apparently they cannot, then you will be jailed. even yes, as a former presidentb of the united states, you, too, are a citizen and are subject to the law like every citizen is.ti we're there.ke we have never been in a place like this before. and that's because really, you know, specific historical b circumstances. when richard nixon resigned the presidency in disgrace, he was caught using the powers of the presidency to mess with his political opponents. he resigned in disgrace, and his vice president who then ascended to the presidency, gave nixon at full pardon. why did he give him a pardon? it says explicitly in the explanation of the pardon, it says that happened so nixon would not face arrest and indictment and trial.

he had resigned the presidency at least, right, so the threat he posed to the country was over.e and so he was allowed to evade personal punishment. remember, though, that was less than a year after nixon's vice president also resigned, also as part of effectively a plea deal with the justice department to avoid in his case what would have otherwise been his prosecution on 40 felony se corruption charges. what happened to spiro agnew was a little bit like what happened to nixon. in his case, there wasn't a pardon but there was a plea deat to avoid prosecution. so the dynamic was the same.se because agnew agreed to leave office, that meant the threat he posed to the country as a deeply corrupt person and high elected office, that threat was over, and because he left office, he t was allowed to evade significant

personal punishment. and so neither nixon nor agnew went to jail for even a day. now, though, we're learning the consequences of, you know, in our history, letting presidents evade personal punishment when they have committed crimes. because now we have a former president who isn't leaving office like nixon did, like agnew did. now we have one who isn't eliminating the ongoing danger to the public by getting out of public life. so maybe that could have been what he traded his freedom for. no, for our sins what we've got now is one of these guys who is staying in public life. and therefore, the threat is arrive. he's threatening to get back into the presidency with four different criminal trials t stacked up like taxiing planes on a runway.y. so no, none of us having any idea what it will mean for us a

a country for him to be sent tot jail as part of these criminal proceedings is part of what is new for us in this moment. today, justice juan merchan in new york said jail is what is ti coming next if trump continues to disobey court orders. and do you think he's going to continue to disobey these courtk orders? justice merchan today said, quote, i worry about the people who would have to execute that sanction. the court officers, the correction officers, the secreti service detail among others. i worry about them, and about what would go into executing such a sanction. of course, i'm also aware of the broader implications of such a sanction, but at the end of the day, i have a job to do. your continued violations of a this court's lawful order threaten to interfere with the administration of justice, constant attacks which constitute a direct attack on ac the rule of law. i cannot allow that to continue. as much as i don't want to impose a jail sanction, i want you to understand that i will. i will do it if i have to. your direct attack on the rule of law cannot be allowed to continue. just a signal moment in american history today.

and it's sort of clearer to me on this day at this moment than it's ever been in my lifetime. i that the rule of law isn't just a bumper sticker. it isn't an abstract thing. it doesn't float in like a n miasma and suffuse the atmosphere. s the rule of law, specific stuff. and in a day to day way, it means court orders must be obeyed. if you don't obey them, the court will punish you for that. it means for another example, that people who are part of the judicial system, judges, court personnel, juries, witnesses, m, defense lawyers, prosecutors, ij means they're also able to do their work without being threatened or intimidated or being harassed or fired by people who are associated with the accused.re that's law and order. that's the rule of law. that's a nuts and bolts concretr

thing.s and it is under intense incredible pressure. it is having trouble right now in our country. because as the judge in trump's first criminal trial is trying to stand up for the rule of law today, as he said in this warning to trump, this cross ths rubicon moment in court where he warned trump he's making plans to jail him if he keeps violating the court's order. while that is happening, simultaneously, the republican controlled senate in the state n of georgia is moving forward on what appears to be their plans to subpoena the prosecutor who is leading the criminal case against trump in the state of t georgia. district attorney fani willis is leading that proscoug. as soon as she opened that investigation, the republican-led legislature in georgia started moving to try tl curtail her authority, to give themselves the ability to fire her as a prosecutor. that process has been weaving and wending through legal as

obstacles for months now.th but now, they are planning to haul the prosecutor, to haul y fani willis into the state ro senate and force her to turn over evidence and testify herself under oath while she de continues to try to lead that prosecution.to meanwhile, simultaneously, on capitol hill, we have now got s the republican chair of the house judiciary committee, jim l jordan, launching apparently some kind of new investigation into one of the assistant district attorneys who was in court today leading the or prosecution of trump and his ne york case. meanwhile, simultaneously, this weekend, the former president hosted a high dollar fund-raiser at his home in florida.ige in which he unbidden brought up the federal prosecutor who is e overseeing his classified documents espionage act prosecution in florida and his i overthrow the government case in washington, d.c.e according to a recording of those proceedings reviewed by nbc news, trump said at this di fund-raiser, quote, deranged um jack smith, one of the sickest

prosecutors in the world, the sick, evil thug, take a look at the deranged. and he's perfect because you look at him, he's not attractivr both inside and out. i mean, you couldn't get a better guy if you're trying to make the devil, that deranged. yes, this is one unattractive dude. that's why -- the former president reportedly said - fricking expletive. that was saturday afternoon, that was not long after he had posted this in all caps online on his social media company. quote, arrest deranged jack smith. he is a criminal. again, the rule of law is not an abstract feeling or sense of being. it's not something you just proclaim to be true and then set it and forget it. terrorizing judges and juries and witnesses and prosecutors is something that breaks the rule of law.

if those people are intimidated and harassed and threatened, the rule of law has been broken. this past friday, california man was criminally charged with making death threats against fulton county district attorney fani willis. a few weeks ago a man in new york was charged with threatening new york's attorney general, tish james, and judge arthur engoron who is overseeing the civil case brought against trump's business by new york attorney general tish james. a woman was sentenced to three years in prison for threatening the judge overseeing trump's documents case in florida. a different woman was charged with threatening the judge charged with overseeing the over throw the government case in washington. not long before that, the fbi fatally shot a man who had threatened to kill the new york district attorney, alvin bragg,a who has brought the case that's currently being argued in gh criminal court in new york. this -- this stuff has consequences and this stuff is

consequences. a we're not looking at some vague future threat to the rule of law. what you're seeing here is actively and currently damaging the rule of law right now. because people are intimidated and terrorized. people who work in the legal system as these alleged crimes are adjudicated there are being harassed, threatened with firing, and intimidated and threatened.in and it is happening in all the criminal cases that surround trump. you might remember this lead in a recent special report from reuters. quote, district judge royce lamberth has been threatened with angry -- by angry criminals, drug cartels, even a qaeda.ru but nothing prepared him for the wave of harassment after he began hearing cases against supporters of former president donald trump who attacked the u.s. capitol in a bid to overturn the 2020 election. lamberth, who was appointed to e the bench by ronald reagan was pointed by right wing websites as part of a deep state

conspiracy to destroy trump and his followers. calls for his execution popped up on pro-trump websites. quote, traitors get ropes, saidu one. after he issued a prison sentence to one idaho woman who pled guilty to joining the riot, lamberth's voice mail filled with death threats. one man found lamberth's home phone number and called repeatedly with graphic vows to murder him. lamberth told reuters, quote, i could not believe how many death threats i got. this is, again, not some future potential threat to the rule of law. this is damage to the rule of law, and it is here already.is when participating in the adjudication of alleged crimes by a political figure and his followers bring you death threats, the rule of law has been bent. the rule of law has been broken.

those harms to the rule of law, that damage to the rule of law has been inflicted already. the prospect of jail for the republican party's active presidential nominee, that is here already. he got his face-to-face warning in court today in new york.ac one more violation of the court's order banning him from a speaking about the jury or witnesses in the case, and he will be put in jail. with secret service detail. that time is now here. which means we are about to find out what it's like to be a country that has a presidential candidate and former president in jail because he refuses to follow court orders. it's not a thought experiment anymore. it's not the future. it is here. are we ready? and the rule of law and the democratic system go together. as the rule of law has bent and been broken by trump and his of movement, we have also seen the democratic system bend and get broken by trump and his movement. obviously, we did not have a peaceful transfer of power the last time he competed in and

lost an election. there is no commitment at all, no expectation at all by anyone that he and his followers will allow for a peaceful transfer of power this next time. if he loses this next election as well. he's not even giving lip service to the idea that they will allow for a peaceful transfer of a power. he won't even say it and not mean it. and even more importantly than not just coming out of his face, in his republican party, accepting that his followers will not abide the results of the next election and neither will the republican party in all of its power, in all of its resources, accepting that is now the price of admission to power in that party. in march of this year, the republican national committee hired two new lawyers to oversee the party's election year legal efforts.

now just two months after that, of those two lawyers one has been indicted for helping in the effort to keep him in power illegally after he lost the last election, and the second one of those two lawyers has just been pushed out of his job at the rnc, reportedly because he's not willing to do the same thing. quote, trump originally approved of the hiring, one source told cnn, but sources said trump was, then angered after his allies pointed to clips of the lawyer criticizing the false claims c that the 2020 election was stolen. so two lawyers hired by the rnc to oversee legal efforts around the 2024 election, one of them herself now under indictment, the other one reportedly fired n for casting doubt that the last election was stolen. for suggesting that the real election results were a real thing. think about that for a second. the chief counsel of the national republican party just fired reportedly because he was insufficiently enthusiastic about falsifying election results, about working to throw out real election results and get trump into power despite them.

i know this feels like an incremental update on the day's news but just step back from this for a second. if it is now the de facto position of the mainstream republican party that we're not going to use the real results of elections to decide who is in power, if in order to be in a position of authority in the republican party now, you must now pledge to reject election results, then tell me how are we going to decide who is in power in this country? what's the other mechanism we're going to use if it's not real election results? the idea that there is an abstract rule of law or an abstract democracy that exists ambiently in the atmosphere and some day we might lose it, that's not how this goes. the rule of law is mortal. it can be killed.

it is wounded when the people involved in the judicial system and the adjudication of alleged crimed are being threatened and harassed and pressured out of their jobs for doing that work.e similarly, democracy is mortal. it can be killed. it doesn't go away by someone one day proclaiming we're no longer hereby a democracy. it goes away when there stops being an expectation we're governed by democratic means. when there stops being an expectation that elections decide who is in power. the way you lose your democracy is by losing the expectation that we are participating in an election because all sides in that election plan to accept the result, right, to go home if they lose and to go into office if they win. once we no longer expect that, we are no longer in a democratic system of government in many important respects. once one of the two major governing parties no longer believes elections are binding, then in many important ways the

democracy ship has sailed. because they are no longer competing on democratic grounds. right. once one of the two major parties is no longer pledging that they will abide by the election results whether they win or lose, the democratic system of government is not threatened with harm, it is wounded already. and so what do we do about that? one way to start dealing with that is to stop pretending that it's not happening.p threats to the rule of law are not a theoretical prospect looming some time in the futurei they are here. prosecutors and judges and jurors and witnesses need defending right now. right now.ri because they're being threatened right now. who, for example, who is xa defending fani willis in georgia right now? the republican-led legislature

in georgia is trying to destroy her and remove her in order to stop her from prosecuting the alleged crimes of former president donald trump. who is defending her? threats to a democracy are not a theoretical prospect that looms some time in the future, just like threats to the rule of law. threats to democracy are also here now. poll workers and election workers have been chased out of those jobs by the thousands by violence and harassment and threats that are already here and that have already done their work. who is going to stand up and say, okay, well, i'm capable, i'm brave. i'm willing to do something hard for my country and i can take one of those jobs, i can take one of those seats. i can drive people to the polls and door knock for a campaign ck that i wasn't planning on working for. i will work at a polling place. who is going to stand up and do

that? because thousands of experienced poll workers have been chased tromtheir jobs because an rs anti-democratic movement in this country led by the former president has produced such an environment of threat and harassment and violence around those very low-level jobs in tha technical part of our democracy that those jobs are unfilled. who will fill those jobs? who will do that work? it's not an esoteric thing. it's a practical thing, and the time is now.w. it's here. and i think the other part of it is recognizing that there is a n reason that this is all happening. and this to me is the opposite of interivating. to me this is energizing. understanding why it's happening, understand the larger plot this is part of. pulitzer prize winning historian anne applebaum is here tonight. we're going to be speaking with her in just a few moments. she's just written this in the atlantic which i think is really important. the title is, democracy is losing the propaganda war. autocrats in china, russia, and other places around the world c

are now colluding with maga a republicans to discredit liberalism and freedom everywhere. applebaum writes autocratic regimes have slowly turned their repressive mechanisms outward into the democratic world. if people are naturally drawn to the image of human rights, to the dream of freedom, then those concepts have to be poisoned. f that requires more than a political system that defends against liberal ideas. it also requires an offensive plan, a narrative that damages the idea of democracy everywhere in the world. and the tools to deliver it. she says, quote, here is a difficult truth. a part of the american political spectrum is not merely a passive recipient of the combined authoritarian narratives that come from these countries that

are working to discredit democracy. but a part of the american political spectrum is an active participant in creating and spreading these narratives. like the leaders of those authoritarian countries, the de american maga right also wants a americans to believe that their democracy is degenerate, their elections illegitimate. their civilization dying. the maga movement's leaders also have an interest in pumping nihilism and cynicism into the brains of their fellow citizens and convincing them that nothing they see is true. their goals are so similar that it is hard to distinguish ar between the online american alt right and its foreign amplifiers who have multiplied since the days when this was w solely a russian project. one could call this a secret authoritarian plot to spread anti-democratic conspiracy theories.

except that it's not a secret. it's all visible right on the surface. authoritarian regimes working with americans to discredit democracy, to undermine the credibility of democrat, leaders to mock the rule of law. they do so with the goal of electing trump, whose second ru presidency would damage the image of democracy around the w world as well as the stability of democracy in america. even further. we'll speak with anne applebaum in a moment.k i'll just say, there is a reaso. why the damage to the rule of ge law in our country, the damage to democracy in our country, which we have already started living with, there's a reason why it is coinciding with a rise in authoritarianism around the n world. and it's because we as a country are not immune to the same pro-authoritarian, anti-democratic whims that blow through europe and all over the rest of the world now too. our democracy is mortal too, just like every other democracy in history has ever been. being real about the harm that has been done to us already, being clear eyed about the fact we can see some of these same dynamics at work in other countries. tuning in to the fact that the

right under donald trump is admiring of and openly emulating the way other countries have destroyed their democracies, recognizing they are willingly part of this project, that, to me, is energizing. i feel like that at least should put some steel in our spine, because it should tell us the part that we have to play here. it should at least give us real grounded practical expectations of where this is all going to go next and where our efforts are most needed to stand up for who we are. it should give us a clear sense of what we're going to need to defend and protect very soon when the leader of our country's branch of this movement some time very soon almost inevitabla is going to break that court order again and is now, we know today, going to be ordered into a jail cell. he inevitably very soon is going to be ordered into jail. because we are on the precipice of that happening, and all the freak out that's going to attend it is something we should

expect. we need to be ready. we're on the precipice of that next step in what has already been a very difficult time for us as a country. so heads up, this is no time to check out. stay with us.

the pulitzer prizes were awarded today. the most prestigious award in

journalism. one of the pulitsers went to this man, who is one of most important people in the world. his name is vladimir kara-murza having been a guest on this show in the past. he is a journalist and a political activist. he's an outspoken critic of russian president vladimir putin which of course means he is in prison. all putin's critics are in prison. or dead. or in exile. he won a pulitzer today for a series of essays he wrote for "the washington post" about fighting for democracy in russia and how dangerous it is to do so. he was convicted of treason. he's serving a 25-year sentence in russia. the citation for his prize today says he was awarded for his passionate columns written under great personal risk from his prison cell. warning about the consequences of diisn't in putin's russia.

tomorrow, vladimir putin will be inaugurated for yet another term as president of russia, marking his 25th year and counting. on the eve of that inauguration tonight, there's news russia is planning military exercises for russian troops to practice using tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield in their war in ukraine. financial times cites three european intelligence agencies today warning russia is plotting violent acts of sabotage all across europe including bombings and arson and attacks on infrastructure. we have also had new news about russian propaganda operations shifting their focus here in the united states to try to among other things supercharge and exploit divisions created among americans by arguments over the war in gaza. the russian propaganda operation, though, has taken its mission well beyond the one issue of israel and gaza in a blockbuster piece today for the atlantic magazine, pulitzer prize winning historian anne

applebaum documents the sustained and converging effort by russia and other authoritarian countries including china to try to advance authoritarian governance not just by controlling their own populations but by directing their efforts externally, trying to spoil the idea of democracy not just in their own countries but everywhere, particularly in the places where it's been particularly successful. quote, the russians, the chinese, the iranians and others all know the language of transparency, accountability, justice and democracy appeals to some of their citizens as it does to many people who live in dictatorships. as to many people who live in dictatorships. even the most sophisticated surveillance can't wholly suppress it. the ideas of democracy and freedom must be discredited, especially in the places where they have historically flourished.

places like, say, here in the united states of america. our democracy. joining us now is anne applebaum, staff writer at the atlantic. thank you very much for being here. nice to see you. >> thank you. >> i remember thinking about and writing about russia's panic over democratic wins blowing through ukraine and putin's commitment that there couldn't be a thriving democratic country on russia's borders. what you're writing about today in the atlantic is the idea both in russia and among other authoritarian countries that there can't be thriving democracy anywhere in the world, no matter where the borders are. why do you think that shift has happened? >> i think that the leaders of russia and china and iran and venezuela and burma and many other countries looked around the world. they saw that inside their own countries, among their exiles, among their friends of their exiles, there were -- there was an attraction to ideas about the rule of law as you have been

talking about, ideas of transparency and accountability, the ideas that rulers should work on behalf of the ruled and not simply act in their own interests. and they realized that in order to defeat those ideas at home, they were also going to have to seek to undermine them abroad. and so over the last decade, they have been slowly coalescing around a kind of authoritarian narrative that portrays autocracies as stabling and safe, and democracies like ours as divided, dangerous, degenerate, weak, and whenever they can, whenever there's an opportunity, they promote that narrative as i say, they do it inside their own countries and because we now all live in a global information space, they promote it wherever else, inside the u.s., inside europe, inside africa, inside latin america. my article just gathers together the pieces of evidence of how

they have built networks of china has a network of newspapers and media companies in africa. russia has a whole series of information laundering operations that websites and other real and fake news organizations that promote russian propaganda, and they use these tools in order to influence us. >> why does the american maga right, the pro-trump right -- not why does, but i guess how does it integrate with that? i think we all learned a lot over the last decade about foreign influence operations and why authoritarian governments might want to change our form of government, might want to install a kind of leader who would radically change who we are and muck things up in the american system. but why would the pro-trump movement more broadly want to integrate and how would they integrate with that larger authoritarian project from those other countries you described? >> so i think it's really

important to understand that it's not a conspiracy. there's not a secret room where they meet, you know, and make a decision about what they're going to promote. it's simply that they have interest in common. so there's a part of the republican party, not all of it, but a very important part of it that also seeks to portray the united states as divided, as degenerate, as decaying and declining because if that's the case, then they have a legitimate right to try to change that system. to install a different kind of leadership or a different kind of government. and the russian and chinese and other countries amplify them, they pick and choose from russian and chinese narratives and put them in their propaganda. we can see some directly. there have been famous quotations in the last several weeks of examples of senators

and congressmen saying that we hear russian narratives being used on the floor of the house and the senate. fake narratives about president zelenskyy in ukraine, for example, buying yachts. we her that as part of a senate debate. they take these stories and use them as part of their own propaganda. it's simply that they have similar goals and they're using the same kind of language. >> and it has the same kind of effect, whether or not it's supported by foreign entities. anne applebaum, thanks for writing this piece, and thanks for helping us understand it. really good to have you here. we've got more news ahead tonight. stay with us. we've got more news ahead tonight. stay with us repair breath freshener. clinically proven to help reverse the four signs of early gum disease. a new toothpaste from parodontax, the gum experts.

what is cirkul? cirkul is what you hope for when life tosses lemons your way. cirkul is your frosted treat with a sweet kick of confidence. cirkul is the effortless energy that gets you in the zone. cirkul, available at walmart and

drinkcirkul.com. her uncle's unhappy. i'm sensing an underlying issue. it's t-mobile. it started when we tried to get him under a new plan. but they they unexpectedly unraveled their “price lock” guarantee. which has made him, a bit... unruly. you called yourself the “un-carrier”. you sing about “price lock” on those commercials. “the price lock, the price lock...” so, if you could change the price, change the name! it's not a lock, i know a lock. so how can we undo the damage? we could all unsubscribe and switch to xfinity. their connection is unreal. and we could all un-experience this whole session. okay, that's uncalled for.

we do have some breaking news tonight from the war in gaza. first tonight israel says it is conducting targeted strikes against what they call hamas targets in eastern rafah. this is an area that the idf calls the last significant stronghold for hamas in gaza. one unnamed u.s. official telling nbc news that the strikes in rafah tonight do not appear to be the large-scale israeli military operation in rafah that the white house has recently been worried about. worried about especially today after idf forces dropped leaflets over eastern rafah warning civilians they needed to evacuate immediately. after those leaflets dropped, thousands of people crowded the streets, families packed up their belongings and fled yet again. the u.n. agency that helped palestinian refugees says 200 people an hour were seen

flooding out of eastern rafah today, seeking safety. that's one development. second, these new strikes and the mass evacuation are happening amid ongoing negotiations for a potential cease-fire. there are tonight mixed signals about whether there might finally be some progress on that front. today, hamas announced that it did tentatively agree to a proposal put forward by egypt and qatar. an arab official told nbc news it would be a three-phase deal. hamas would trade hostages for prisoners held in israel. those releases would take place over six weeks. they would be paired with a halt in military operations. hamas says they agreed to that. but israel says that proposal that hamas is describing is, quote, far from what israel is demanding in any cease-fire agreement. so mixed signals. israel also said it will send a

delegation when talks resume in cairo tomorrow. that means talks at least will resume tomorrow. another sign of how active the situation is, the cia's director, william burns, is in the region now. he's been in qatar for talks on the situation and in israel when the cia director was there and presumably that means the u.s. thinks something can get done. meanwhile, more than a million people are still displaced including thousands of people newly displaced today and tonight. joining us is ben rhodes, former deputy national security adviser under president obama. thanks for being with us. >> good to see you. >> we have been following the competing statements and narratives and descriptions about what's happening in the talks for potential hostage deal, potential cease-fire deal, potential halt to military operations. what's your take on the likelihood that some agreement can be reached some time soon?

>> well, i think this is all connected to the potential looming rafah operation, because one of the principle gaps between hamas and israel in these negotiations is hamas wants a long-term if not a permanent cease-fire, essentially an end to the israeli military operation. what israel wants is a short-term pause in military operation to get some of those hostages out in exchange for palestinian prisoners and then resume the military operation in rafah. if the military operation in rafah goes forward, essentially i think the window closes for that kind of deal to happen. so that's why you see this flurry of diplomatic activity. if israel goes all the way into rafah, i think this window closes. >> the biden administration has been warning of negative consequences for israel if they do move forward with an assault on rafah. today, we did learn about a change in u.s. policy. at least a change in white house actions. we learned that the white house halted a weapons shipment to

israel last week. officials are saying this doesn't reflect a policy change, but it is at least some sort of tactical leverage move. with our israeli allies. should we be wary of over-interpreting that? should we see that as a potential sign the white house might be willing to get more aggressive in terms of the pressure they're putting on netanyahu and the idf? >> i think you should see it that way. rafah has been looming as the potential breaking point substantively between the u.s. and israel for some time. biden has been harder on netanyahu rhetorically, but he's refrained from using a veto or to refrain from providing offensive military assistance, including things like 2,000-pound bombs israel has been using against the population in gaza. now, rafah would be humanitarian catastrophe. you have over a million people there densely packed in. you have aid crossings that come

across that southern border. a lot of people you talked about being displaced have already been displaced once or twice. they don't have anywhere to go where there's food. i think if you see rafah go forward with a full ground invasion, i think it's likely there will be further steps by the biden administration to restrict certain military capabilities. the question is how far do they go, how significant is that break? that remains to be seen. the prefers course for the administration is to get this cease-fire deal in place. that appears to be hanging by a bit of a thread, but they're going to do everything they can to get it done. >> ben rhodes, former deputy national security adviser under president obama. i appreciate you joining us. thanks. we'll be right back. we'll be right back.

hi, i'm jason. i've lost 228 pounds on golo. ♪ changing your habits is the only way that gets you to lose the weight. and golo is the plan that's going to help you do that. just take the first step, go to golo.com.

on this vote, the yeas are 311. the nays are 114. with two recorded as present. two-thirds voting in the affirmative. the resolution is adopted in light of the expulsion of the gentleman from new york, mr. santos, the whole number of the house is now 434. >> good-bye to the gentleman from new york. he was out. that was five months ago, congress voted to expel republican congressman george santos after he was indicted on multiple federal criminal charges including wire fraud, money laundering, aggravated identity theft, should i go on? two-thirds of the house had to vote yes in order to expel him. one of the democrats who voted to expel george santos was this man, congressman henry cuellar of texas. conservative democrat, he is the

only democrat in the house, for example, who opposes abortion rights. he is also now the only democrat in the house who himself is under federal indictment. on friday, doj announced charges against congressman cuellar and his wife for bribery and money laundering. just after the justice department announced those charges, congressman cuellar released a statement proclaiming his and his wife's innocence. now, awkwardly, given that he himself voted to expel george santos once george santos was indicted, congressman cuellar also made clear in his post indictment statement that he doesn't intend to resign. he said, quote, let me be clear. i'm running for re-election and will win this november. yes, but then will you vote to expel yourself? like you voted to expel george santos? today, multiple outlets citing single sources reported that congressman cuellar's chief of staff has resigned effective today.

congressman cuellar represents an important swing district in south texas that democrats would very much like to hold on to. but it's not like he's the only democrat who could be competitive there. in 2022, he narrowly fended off a strong primary challenge from a local attorney named jessica cisneros. she was endorsed by several of cuellar's democratic colleagues in the house. despite that and despite the fact that cuellar recently voted to expel george santos over his being indicted by the justice department, congressman cuellar says he's staying put for now. i don't know how long it will take to get to an expulsion vote on him, but honestly, how long can you keep that up? watch this space. se daily gives you long lasting non-drowsy relief. flonase all good. also, try our allergy headache and nighttime pills.

switch to shopify so you can build it better, scale it faster and sell more. much more. take your business to the next stage when you switch to shopify. a slow network is no network for business. that's why more choose comcast business. and now, we're introducing ultimate speed for business

—our fastest plans yet. we're up to 12 times faster than verizon, at&t, and t-mobile. and existing customers could even get up to triple the speeds... at no additional cost. it's ultimate speed for ultimate business. don't miss out on our fastest speed plans yet! switch to comcast business and get started for $49.99 a month. plus, ask how to get up to an $800 prepaid card. call today! all right, that's going to do it for me tonight. "way too early" with jonathan lemire is up next. israeli forces take control of a keyboarding